Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Canada: Let the Greens in Already..

There has been an argument over letting the Green Party into the federal debate. In Canada with our plurality of parties, allowing the Green Party to participate makes a lot of sense. Last election the Greens were not even added to the CBC website as one of the federal parties. I can understand not allowing every party in existence into the federal debates with 16 political parties currently registered ranging from the Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, to the Marijuana Party, to the Western Block Party, to the Neo Rhinos who actually state they don't have a platform they have a happyform it would be slightly absurd to include all parties. The Greens however, have become a viable party.

The Greens unlike the many interesting other parties do compete and organize on a national stage like the Conservatives, Liberals and, NDP. The Greens put viable candidates in pretty much all ridings across the country and in certain ridings are even more organized then some of the other parties. Last election they brought in 6.6% of the popular vote and are currently polling closer to 9% on a national scale. However, due to our first-past-the post system it is difficult to have enough regional concentration to win proportional seats.

The Greens now have their first MP Blair Wilson-West Vancouver. Wilson was formerly a Liberal but left the party and became an independent just recently joining the Green Party. Some see this issue with contention however, the switching of parties has become more frequent within Canadian Politics.

With candidates across the country, their first MP, an established and recognized leader and, a viable National party platform the Greens should be participating in the debates. They are being barred from participating most likely due to the work of the Conservatives and NDP. The Conservatives cite that they shouldn't be allowed because, of a promise of by the Greens and Liberals to not run candidates in their leaders' ridings, something that has actually happened before in Canadian Politics. The NDP essentially have cited the same incident but it is more likely due to a worry of lost votes of left-leaning voters who would "go Green" so to speak. It is even reported that the Stephen Harper and Jack Layton told stations they would refuse to participate in debates if Elizabeth May was included. To me any party that viable should be included. The Bloc despite not running outside Quebec is included and the Progressive Conservatives when they lost all but two seats were included. What are you really scared of about including the Greens.

Elizabeth May talking about the Election Debates:

Labels: , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Lonecrow said...

Here here. It annoys me to hear conservative party hacks lump the Green Party in as "One of those fringe Parties".

In 2006 election the Greens received over 600,000+ votes. The next party down the list only received ~28,000 votes.

When you look at the complete list from the 2006 election it is clear that the Greens are solidly in the top tier.

2006 Election
=============
5,374,071
4,479,415
1,553,201
2,589,597
664,068 (Greens)
28,152
14,151
9,171
8,980
6,102
3,022
3,002
1,201
1,094
72
*the rest


I predict that the Greens will at the very least double their popular vote this time. And most definitely have members in the house.

11:05 PM  
Blogger Jade said...

Thank you for that good addition. I mean I am not a Green Party supporter necessarily, but I just think their inclusion is only democratically fair.

9:10 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home